News

Palantir Swears It Can't Switch Off NATO's AI War System as Europe Fears a Starlink-Style Kill Switch

Palantir says neither it nor the US government can switch off the Maven Smart System that NATO and several European militaries use, days after Ukraine's Starlink and Starshield links were slowed.

Palantir Swears It Can't Switch Off NATO's AI War System as Europe Fears a Starlink-Style Kill Switch

Palantir wants Europe to know that its battlefield AI has no off button in Washington. The company says neither it nor the US government can reach into the Maven Smart System that NATO's military headquarters and several European armed forces now rely on and shut it down.

The promise lands at an awkward moment. Ukraine has just watched its satellite links get throttled in the middle of a war, and nobody in Washington seems willing to say who made the call.

"There are no kill switches"

Louis Mosley, Palantir's executive vice president for the UK and Europe, made the case in an interview with Reuters in Brussels on Wednesday. He called the recent Starlink news "extremely concerning," then drew a line between SpaceX and his own company.

"As concerns Palantir, I can provide categorical reassurance that where customers have bought our software, they are in full operational control of that software," he said. "There are no kill switches. There's no ability for Palantir or the US government to reach in and switch it off."

The software, he added, "can absolutely be operated independently of us." Customers decide whether Palantir staff help run it at all. Where they do, those employees are citizens of the customer country with the required security clearance, and Mosley says many military and commercial clients already run it on their own.

What Maven actually does

Maven fuses data from satellites, radar, drones and other sensors into one picture, so officers can see the battlefield more clearly and decide faster. NATO bought it for SHAPE, its Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, in March 2025 after a six month procurement, and declared it fully technically capable on June 22, 2026. Euronews reported that Palantir won a 480 million euro tender; neither NATO nor Palantir has disclosed the contract value.

That is core decision software for an alliance's command, built by an American company. Until recently, the question of who could turn it off sounded theoretical.

The Starlink episode

On October 13, Kyiv accused Washington of deliberately slowing Starshield, the SpaceX-operated military satellite service Ukrainian forces depend on at the front, along with Starlink. Last week, equipment on fast-moving Ukrainian drones reportedly stopped working, making it harder to counter Russian attacks. We covered how Starlink speed limits hit Ukrainian drone missions as it unfolded.

Who ordered it remains disputed. Two US officials and a Western official told Defense News the order came from inside the White House, while a senior US official disputed that. Elon Musk wrote on X that "Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government. Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS." Donald Trump said "it wasn't me, and I don't think it was Elon," adding that as far as he understood, "it's the same as it's always been."

For European defense planners, the lesson is uncomfortable. A capability their ally provided got dialed down remotely, in wartime, and accountability evaporated.

Germany and France already said no

Two of Europe's biggest militaries never bought in. Germany and France have declined to adopt Maven for their own forces over dependence on an American supplier. In April, Vice Admiral Thomas Daum, head of the German army's cyber command, said that "allowing industry personnel access to national German datasets is out of the question."

France built its own service, Arcadia, and its domestic intelligence agency is moving to the French firm ChapsVision.

Palantir's pitch is that it is not SpaceX. Its software runs on the customer's terms, staffed by the customer's own cleared people, with no remote lever. That may well be true. But after the past two weeks, Europe is weighing more than a technical architecture. It is deciding how much a US vendor's word is worth when the White House is the other party in the room.

Some offers on this page may be paid placements or contain affiliate links.

Subscribe to Techpresso

Free daily newsletter, read in 5 minutes.

Subscribe free