arXiv Caps Every Submitter at Two Papers a Month After AI Slop Pushed September Submissions Past 40,000

arXiv, the preprint server where much of physics, math and computer science lands first, is now rationing access. Starting Thursday, 1 October, every submitter can file at most two new papers per calendar month, on top of an existing cap of three active submissions at any time.

The reason is volume. arXiv received 40,363 submissions in September 2026, roughly double the 20,569 it saw in September two years earlier. A decade ago, the same month brought in 9,869.

Community engagement manager Kat Boboris announced the change, and it applies to everything: papers written entirely by humans and papers built with AI help alike. arXiv's AI policy already requires authors to disclose significant generative AI use and to meet scholarly standards. According to Boboris, many submissions simply do not, and a lot of what arrives is "thin" and "narrow in scope."

She also flagged a rise in salami slicing, where one piece of work gets carved into several small papers. Editorial advisory council chair Thomas Dietterich put the problem bluntly: "A relatively small proportion of authors are submitting a large number of low-quality papers and consuming a disproportionate fraction of the moderators' time."

Those moderators are volunteers. arXiv became an independent nonprofit this summer after 25 years under Cornell University, and its screening still depends on unpaid experts. Dietterich added that the flood is unfair to people still sending in careful work, whose papers can sit in the queue for days or weeks behind the junk.

The fine print is strict. The limit counts per submitter, the person who actually files, so a paper with ten coauthors only uses one person's allowance, and big labs with many researchers will barely feel it. Rejected papers still count toward the monthly total, so spamming and hoping is now self-defeating.

arXiv calls the cap a stopgap while it works out new best practices, and says it will watch submission rates and moderation load and adjust. In the meantime, it is asking researchers to submit papers that reflect the full scope of their work instead of a stream of incremental ones.

The irony is hard to miss. AI labs are openly pitching models as tireless research assistants, with OpenAI saying it has hit its automated research intern goal, and one of the first places that ambition visibly hit a wall is the free archive where real research gets shared.